Skip to content
Centre for Inquiry Canada (CFIC)

Centre for Inquiry Canada (CFIC)

Your humanist community for scientific, skeptical, secular, and rational inquiry.

  • About
    • What Is CFIC?
      • Mission, Vision, & Values
      • Centre for Inquiry Globally
      • Why We Need CFIC
      • History
    • Areas of Focus
      • Secularism
      • Scientific Skepticism
      • Critical Thinking
      • Building Community
    • Our Structure
      • Governance of CFIC
      • CFIC Bylaws
      • Branches
    • Supporters of CFIC
    • Contact
    • Privacy Statement
  • Media
    • Critical Links Newsletter
    • Podcast for Inquiry (PFI)
    • Other Videos
    • Cost of Religion Report
    • Search Archives
  • Get Involved
    • Join Us
    • Calendar of Events
    • Find a Local Branch
      • Victoria
      • Regina
      • Saskatoon
      • Winnipeg
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
      • Montreal
      • Halifax
      • Virtual Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Mailing List
  • Donate
    • Donate to CFIC
    • CanadaHelps
    • PayPal
    • Interac Transfer
  • Become a Member
  • Toggle search form

Ensure Our Energy Policies Are Sufficiently Safe

Posted on May 1, 2026April 30, 2026 By Critical Links No Comments on Ensure Our Energy Policies Are Sufficiently Safe

Todd De Ryck

We must ensure our energy policies are sufficiently safe and based on science, engineering, evidence and data!

An article in the April 20th, 2026 edition of the Winnipeg Free Press, “Energy security, not more gas tax cuts,” mentions that France and the Philippines are investing in renewables and storage. What was not mentioned is that the Strait of Hormuz closing had minimal impact on France’s electricity because nuclear energy makes it electricity-independent.  March 12, 2026, France’s Nuclear Policy Council – headed by President Emmanuel Macron—reconfirmed the need to revitalise the country’s nuclear power industry in order “to guarantee France’s sovereignty, make energy accessible to the French people and our businesses, and combat climate change”. France averaged 31 grams of CO2/kWh in emissions in all of 2025 (and has maintained this for over 40 years), while Germany emitted 342, despite spending 500+ billion euros on its “energy transition” in the last 20+ years (the Philippines was over 500, and Spain was 136). Earlier in 2026, German Chancellor Merz stated that Germany’s exit from nuclear power was a “strategic mistake,” as did European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen regarding Europe’s exit from nuclear power. The Philippines is certainly interested in nuclear power, including finally putting the Bataan nuclear power plant into service.

Energy storage was also mentioned in the Winnipeg Free Press article. BESS (Battery energy storage system) consume more electricity than they deliver and spend more time charging than discharging. There is much hype about BESS, but when the numbers are examined, the hype may not be completely warranted. Read technical details about the “Pros and Cons of Utility-scale Battery Storage”.

Spain was mentioned in the Winnipeg Free Press article, but their April 28, 2025 blackout was not mentioned. The causes of the Spanish blackout on April 28, 2025 are still debated. However, a thorough examination of the data clearly shows that weather-dependent electricity generators played a major role in the cause. In the official report, it is clearly articulated that wind and solar did not contribute to the grid’s restart; they were permitted to rejoin the network only after it was stabilized.

The Spanish blackout spurred increased support for nuclear energy, evidenced by more countries committing to at least triple nuclear power by 2050. From June 19, 2025, “Estonia abandons target to produce 100% of domestic energy renewably” and “Climate Minister Andres Sutt also stated that nuclear energy is now a priority.” Despite spending $ trillions globally on weather-dependent electricity generators over the last 20+ years, this has done almost nothing to permanently displace fossil fuel production, as this “global annual energy consumption” graph clearly shows.

Given the ever-increasing importance of energy security and climate change emergencies, our energy policies must now be based, more than ever, on science, engineering, evidence and data. Please consider learning more about nuclear energy and read “Going Nuclear” by Dr. Tim Gregory. Watch the recording of the Feb. 9th webinar “Various Nuclear Reactor Types with Dr. Matthew Memmott“.

a4a, critical links, Science, slider Tags:critical links, Science

Post navigation

Previous Post: Where Secular Minds Meet: CFIC Discord
Next Post: Select No Religion (2026)

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Donate via PayPal
Donate via Interac
Donate via CanadaHelps

Categories

a4a Announcement assistance for apostates Blasphemy Laws Blasphemy Laws CFI Community CFIC Volunteers Climate Change Cost of Religion critical links critical thinking Critical Thinking Week Debate Education Educational Material environment Event Give to CFIC governance health humanism Human Rights Information International Human Rights Living without Religion Media Advisory Medicine philosophy podcast Policy Press Release pseudoscience Quick Links quicklinks Science ScienceChek Science Literacy Secular Check Secularism Secularism in Schools Secular Rescue skeptics slider Think Check volunteer

View Full Calendar

Contact

Center for Inquiry Canada (CFIC) Logo

info@centreforinquiry.ca
613-663-8198
PO Box 83045, Ottawa RPO Bank Walkley, Ontario, K1V 1A3

CFI Canada is a CRA-Registered Educational Charity. Charitable Registration Number: 83364 2614 RR0001

Read our Privacy Statement.

Explore

Our Mission
History of CFIC
Latest Announcements
Podcast for Inquiry (PFI)
Donate to CFIC
Become a Member

Follow Us

Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2026 Centre for Inquiry Canada (CFIC).

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme