Skip to content
Centre for Inquiry Canada

Centre for Inquiry Canada

Your humanist community for scientific, skeptical, secular, and rational inquiry

  • About
    • About CFIC
    • What Is CFIC?
      • Mission, Vision, & Values
      • Centre for Inquiry Globally
      • Why We Need CFIC
      • History
    • Areas of Focus
      • Secularism
      • Scientific Skepticism
      • Critical Thinking
      • Building Community
    • Our Structure
      • Governance of CFIC
      • CFIC Bylaws
      • Branches
    • Contact
    • Privacy Statement
  • Media
    • Critical Links Newsletter
    • Podcast for Inquiry
    • Search Archives
    • Videos
    • Cost of Religion Report
  • Get Involved
    • Join Us
    • Calendar of Events
    • Find a Local Branch
      • Victoria
      • Regina
      • Saskatoon
      • Winnipeg
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
      • Montreal
      • Halifax
      • Virtual Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Mailing List
  • Donate
    • Donate to CFIC
    • CanadaHelps
    • PayPal
    • Interac Transfer
  • Become a Member
  • Toggle search form

The First Rule of Soap Club: Don’t Analyze Our Claims

Posted on September 21, 2019September 25, 2019 By info 1 Comment on The First Rule of Soap Club: Don’t Analyze Our Claims

By Zack Dumont

I don’t even need to provide an example. We’ve all seen it before. I’m referring to the lofty claim that some new and/or improved soap “kills 99.9% of bacteria”. In the spirit of Scientific Literacy week, I’d like to share what goes through my mind when I see claims like this. My intention is not to be smug, but inspire critical thought in others when they’re evaluating scientific claims. Perhaps if you’re already on board with these views of mine then revisiting may not serve you well… but maybe, just maybe, you could find these questions useful next time you hear someone else at risk of being deceived. Here goes my breakdown of this ubiquitous claim.

Regarding “Kills”:

  • Where has this killing been shown to occur? On my skin? On someone else’s skin? On another living creature’s skin? In a lab somewhere (eg, on a Petri dish)? The proximity to the proposed site of action is critical. Just because something can be killed in a lab doesn’t mean it can be killed on my skin. I’m not expecting the company to test the soap on me, but a lab bench experiment is pretty far removed from measuring real world effects. There are many scientific claims based on what is seen in a laboratory and then never pan out when put into the field.

Regarding “99.9%”:

  • If you have even just a rough idea of how much bacteria can be found on any surface, let alone something warm and organic (such as the skin on our hands), then you’ll know that even 0.1% left over is a lot! And of what’s left over… shouldn’t I be concerned that a super-powerful soap couldn’t kill it, and now it’s left unchecked with all that food and nourishment around?

Regarding “bacteria”:

  • Going back to the first stream of questions – did the soap kill 99.9% of a single species of bacteria in a lab somewhere? Or does it kill 99.9% of the different types of bacteria (of which there are thousands of species and strains!)?
  • Do I want to kill the bacteria? Are all bacteria bad? Aren’t some bacteria good? Don’t we buy products with probiotics in them?

Governments and regulators with some impetus to be business-friendly (self-imposed or not), will have a hard time protecting consumers against these seemingly benign marketing claims; especially considering how many are out there and the resources that would be required to police it. Further, claims like these are difficult to forbid as they will have some element of truth to them – the soap probably did kill most of some bacteria somewhere. With these factors combined, it’s left to consumers to cut through the marketing and hype. At this, some people are better trained and more experienced than others. Time-permitting, and with skill for teaching adults (which is quite different from teaching children), you can share your insight with others. But in reality, time is tight and most others’ patience for learning new things is even more scarce. So, if nothing else, asking out-loud questions like the ones above are a quick and easy way to minimally create some cognitive discrepancy in those willing to listen. Plant some seeds of doubt, then with tolerance, watch to see if something takes root. If yes, nourish it. If not, keep planting those seeds!

For more on this topic, check out Sabrina Stierwalt’s article in Scientific American<1>.

Reference:

<1> Stierwalt S. Does Soap Really Kill 99.9 Percent of Germs? Scientific American Jly 11, 2016. Avialable from: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/does-soap-really-kill-99-9-percent-of-germs/.

critical thinking, Science, Science Literacy

Post navigation

Previous Post: Florida Clean Energy Company’s Hydrogen 2.0 Claims Stirring Doubt and Skepticism in New Brunswick
Next Post: Science Literacy Week 2019

Comment (1) on “The First Rule of Soap Club: Don’t Analyze Our Claims”

  1. Pingback: Science Literacy Week 2019 – Centre for Inquiry Canada

Comments are closed.

Donate via PayPal
Donate via Interac
Donate via CanadaHelps

Categories

a4a Announcement assistance for apostates Blasphemy Laws Blasphemy Laws CFI Community CFIC Volunteers Climate Change Cost of Religion critical links critical thinking Critical Thinking Week Debate Education Educational Material environment Event Give to CFIC governance health humanism Human Rights Information International Human Rights Living without Religion Media Advisory Medicine philosophy podcast Policy Press Release pseudoscience Quick Links quicklinks Science ScienceChek Science Literacy Secular Check Secularism Secularism in Schools Secular Rescue skeptics slider Think Check volunteer

View Full Calendar

CFI Canada is a CRA-Registered Educational Charity
Charitable Registration Number: 83364 2614 RR0001

Privacy Statement

Copyright © 2025 Centre for Inquiry Canada.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme