Vaccines Cause Optimism
A question posed by a parent in an antivaccine Facebook group:
Measles was declared “eliminated” in Canada in 1998, and in the US in 2000. Perhaps this has caused people to become complacent, which has enabled the antivaccine movement to gain a foothold to the extent that several countries in Europe have recently lost their measles-free status (https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/29/health/europe-measles-outbreaks-scli-intl/index.html), and the US is at risk of losing its status in October (https://www.cnn.com/2019/08/28/health/us-measles-elimination-status-in-jeopardy/index.html).
Anti-vaxxers often claim support from peer-reviewed sources – for example, one article in Natural News cited a paper about measles vaccination from the American Journal of Public Health (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1646939/).
Taken out of context, this quote might be seen as critical of the effectiveness of the vaccine:
“Vaccine failures among apparently adequately vaccinated individuals were sources of infection for at least 48 per cent of the cases in the outbreak.”
But reading further, the conclusions are much more positive:
“There was no evidence to suggest that waning immunity was a contributing factor among the vaccine failures. Close contact with cases of measles in the high school, source or provider of vaccine, sharing common activities or classes with cases, and verification of the vaccination history were not significant risk factors in the outbreak. The outbreak subsided spontaneously after four generations of illness in the school and demonstrates that when measles is introduced in a highly vaccinated population, vaccine failures may play some role in transmission but that such transmission is not usually sustained.”
It would seem that much of the success of the anti-vaccine movement can be attributed to the fact that most people do not understand probability and statistics (hence the success of casinos and government lotteries – see also https://www.harpercollins.ca/9781443453097/knock-on-wood/).
For example, let’s take a hypothetical population of 2001 students, of which 2000 are vaccinated and 1 is not, and expose them to measles. For this case, we’ll assume that the probability of contracting the disease is 1% for a vaccinated person, and 50% for an unvaccinated person (note that measles is actually much more contagious than this conservative estimate). So, the 1 unvaccinated person would have even odds of escaping the disease, while it is very likely that at least 20 of the 2000 vaccinated people will get sick. So, it would not be surprising if the unvaccinated person stayed healthy, and only vaccinated people got sick. But if you had 2000 unvaccinated and 1 vaccinated, the vaccinated person would have a 99% chance of not getting sick, while the expectation would be that about 1000 people would come down with measles, one of whom would likely get encephalitis resulting in permanent brain damage or death (not to mention the risk of a few dozen having other complications such as pneumonia, or permanent deafness and blindness).
- Are Organized Religions a Possible Public Health Hazard “Vector”? Apparently we have our job to do…
- 2015/2016 Flu Shot is a Good Idea
- Vaccine records – Who’s responsible?
- International Women’s Day
- Support Secularism in British Columbia
- Sign, Sign, Everywhere a Sign
- Pro-Vaccination Art
- Timothy Caulfield coming to Ottawa
- Canada’s Standing Committee on Health (HESA): Report 13
- Canada’s Blasphemous Libel Law
- Another Pediatric Death by World View
- US to tighten rules on homeopathic “medicines”
- Brief Overview of GMOs
- CFIDiscourse #2: On Pseudo-skepticism and the Vice of Open-Mindedness
- Science Literacy Week 2019
- Charlie Hebdo and the Question of Blasphemy
- International Human Rights
- Welcome to the Centre for Inquiry
- Supreme Court Decision
- CFI Canada Student Campus Groups
- CFIC Condemns Superstition-based Violence
- Is it Science?
- The First Rule of Soap Club: Don’t Analyze Our Claims
- CFIC Discourse
- Is God a Figment of our Imagination?
- Assisted Dying in Canada: Where Do We Go From Here
- Raif Badawi
- Will You Make a Commitment to Reason and Science Today?
- CFIC’s Ethical Perspectives
- Unfriending the Future: Motivated Empathy in Science and Political Advocacy
- CFIC’s founding principles
- Who is CFIC, and what do we do?
- Against Quebec’s Bill C21
- Secular Humanists and Atheists Grieve With the Nation
- Iceland Removes Blasphemy Law!
- CFI Condemns Murders at Charlie Hebdo
- February 26 – Avijit Roy Day Honouring Murdered Atheist Writers in Bangladesh
- History of Centre for Inquiry Canada
- Vote for Science
- How To Help
- CFI Canada Condemns All Faith-Based Violence
- 2018 Message from the Chair of the Board of Directors
- Crisis in Nepal: What can we do?
- The Cave Painter
- A Call for Justice
- Spoon Bending and Higher Learning
- Carl Sagan Day 2014 at CFI Canada!
- History and Mandate
- Canada is Repealing its Blasphemy Law
- Not Over Yet! Humanists Should Speak out on the Right to Die with Dignity
- Could Earth Collide with an Asteroid?
- What is CFIC
- CFIC Branches
- Grandmother Fish
- Secular Humanists Grieve with the LGBTQ Community of Orlando, FLA