Skip to content
Centre for Inquiry Canada

Centre for Inquiry Canada

Your humanist community for scientific, skeptical, secular, and rational inquiry

  • About
    • About CFIC
    • What Is CFIC?
      • Mission, Vision, & Values
      • Centre for Inquiry Globally
      • Why We Need CFIC
      • History
    • Areas of Focus
      • Secularism
      • Scientific Skepticism
      • Critical Thinking
      • Building Community
    • Our Structure
      • Governance of CFIC
      • CFIC Bylaws
      • Branches
    • Contact
    • Privacy Statement
  • Media
    • Critical Links Newsletter
    • Podcast for Inquiry
    • Search Archives
    • Videos
    • Cost of Religion Report
  • Get Involved
    • Join Us
    • Calendar of Events
    • Find a Local Branch
      • Victoria
      • Regina
      • Saskatoon
      • Winnipeg
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
      • Montreal
      • Halifax
      • Virtual Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Mailing List
  • Donate
    • Donate to CFIC
    • CanadaHelps
    • PayPal
    • Interac Transfer
  • Become a Member
  • Toggle search form

Keith’s Conundrums: A Puzzle Hunt

Posted on December 28, 2022July 31, 2023 By Critical Links 1 Comment on Keith’s Conundrums: A Puzzle Hunt

Keith Douglas

About last time, Alex B. sent along the idea that this was worth thinking about — thanks! My own view of the possibility and necessity puzzle is really that there is not much use to modal logic as presented. It does entail that calculating possibility is harder if one uses (for example) a state space approach. There is something called “provability logic” due to Boolos (not Boole!) that is useful in some contexts, but it is about purely logical possibility. I do not know why philosophers really enjoy the modal logic approaches. All I was ever taught (by their partisans) is that finally we understand possibility and necessity better through them. I simply dispute this.

For those who follow philosophy of religion, ask how you would use modal logic to analyze the traditional theological claim “God is a necessary being.” This is harder than it sounds, especially if one keeps the domains and ranges correct as I have suggested one must. Hint: Alvin Plantinga’s use basically reduces to a question of which modal logic to use, and he has to independently motivate that or beg the question. (Worse, he then must contend with the domain question, too.)

A Puzzle Hunt

This month’s conundrum is a slightly crazed trivia puzzle, which, if completed successfully, entitles the solver to a prize! Each clue is semi-independent, and together they should help you locate the prize. Your accent (whether Australian, Canadian, German, or Korean) will not help you.

  1. The commonest chemical element
  2. Réponse, en anglais
  3. Mind this and your Qs
  4. Family of carriable mounted spears
  5. Town of many elements
  6. We are the knights that say …
  7. Often the same faculty as architecture
  8. Title of a book by Jerry Coyne
  9. With me, a couple, perhaps?
  10. Mr. Burns’ catchphrase
  11. Victims of Turkey
  12. Could maybe have been called a legislative assembly of the gluteus maximus
  13. What every cybersecurity professional worries about
  14. With banged gavel, to create calm
  15. Relative of Wilt, too soft on bigoted Austrian
  16. Mind or we
  17. Euclid’s translated alphabet book?
  18. You’d think after all the musicals, she would have the firearm by now
  19. People prefer this to olds, usually
  20. With a purple disinfectant, a favourite classroom explosive
  21. Typically the opposite of good
  22. The last clue is this part of the puzzle
critical links, critical thinking

Post navigation

Previous Post: Inquiry… For a More Secular Nation
Next Post: When Religious Leaders Become Atheists

Comment (1) on “Keith’s Conundrums: A Puzzle Hunt”

  1. Alex Berljawsky says:
    January 1, 2023 at 3:41 pm

    I don’t know if I got many of the puzzle clues, but I’d like to try a naive answer:
    Location being Oslo, Norway, and the prize being the Nobel Peace Prize. ???

Comments are closed.

Donate via PayPal
Donate via Interac
Donate via CanadaHelps

Categories

a4a Announcement assistance for apostates Blasphemy Laws Blasphemy Laws CFI Community CFIC Volunteers Climate Change Cost of Religion critical links critical thinking Critical Thinking Week Debate Education Educational Material environment Event Give to CFIC governance health humanism Human Rights Information International Human Rights Living without Religion Media Advisory Medicine philosophy podcast Policy Press Release pseudoscience Quick Links quicklinks Science ScienceChek Science Literacy Secular Check Secularism Secularism in Schools Secular Rescue skeptics slider Think Check volunteer

View Full Calendar

CFI Canada is a CRA-Registered Educational Charity
Charitable Registration Number: 83364 2614 RR0001

Privacy Statement

Copyright © 2025 Centre for Inquiry Canada.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme