Skip to content
Centre for Inquiry Canada

Centre for Inquiry Canada

Your humanist community for scientific, skeptical, secular, and rational inquiry

  • About
    • About CFIC
    • What Is CFIC?
      • Mission, Vision, & Values
      • Centre for Inquiry Globally
      • Why We Need CFIC
      • History
    • Areas of Focus
      • Secularism
      • Scientific Skepticism
      • Critical Thinking
      • Building Community
    • Our Structure
      • Governance of CFIC
      • CFIC Bylaws
      • Branches
    • Contact
    • Privacy Statement
  • Media
    • Critical Links Newsletter
    • Podcast for Inquiry
    • Search Archives
    • Videos
    • Cost of Religion Report
  • Get Involved
    • Join Us
    • Calendar of Events
    • Find a Local Branch
      • Victoria
      • Regina
      • Saskatoon
      • Winnipeg
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
      • Montreal
      • Halifax
      • Virtual Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Mailing List
  • Donate
    • Donate to CFIC
    • CanadaHelps
    • PayPal
    • Interac Transfer
  • Become a Member
  • Toggle search form

Keith’s Conundrums: A New Puzzle Hunt

Posted on March 30, 2023April 30, 2023 By Critical Links 1 Comment on Keith’s Conundrums: A New Puzzle Hunt

Keith Douglas

Steve and Mike report trying to formalize Curry’s paradox and getting stuck over self-reference. They can proceed in this direction; many have. Those interested can look up Gödel numbers. Alex points out an iterated conditional and how it is difficult to understand. In ordinary language iterated conditionals are very rare. Some philosophers of language think this is significant for the philosophy of logic. I am not sure. 

Thanks, everyone, for the interest. This puzzle is like The Liar (“this statement is false”) but harder still to think through.

A New Puzzle Hunt

We have a new puzzle hunt, this one related to domains of knowledge and their worldly referents. Once again, one gets a prize by solving all the individual challenges. Hint: a flawed but interesting book, on the theme of the puzzle.

1. Biomedical _____ is the discipline devoted to right and wrong, professional practice, safety, etc., in medical and adjacent fields.

2. _____ is the most general factual field of knowledge, according to M. Bunge and D. Armstrong (and the present author).

3. The area of knowledge associated with Herman Daly (two words).

4. The study of rocks, minerals, etc.

5. Scientific _____ can be taken as the thesis that scientific hypotheses are truth-apt (can be evaluated for literal truth and falsity).

6. The philosophical viewpoint (not to be confused with the epistemology of scientists) that knowledge can only be obtained through the senses.

7. For any proposition A, not-A can be said to be its (or one of its) _____.

8. The object of study of some anthropologists.

9. The applied science and technology of learning, motivation, reasoning, etc., as potentially useful in the classroom, rehearsal, workshop, etc.

10. The study of human beings generally.

11. Someone who studies the synthesis of molecules performed on behalf of and within nervous systems.

12. One of Bunge’s “mixed sciences” — the study of statistical properties of human populations.

13. Anatomy and _____; a department at McGill whose second component should not be confused with microbiology.

14. The branch of medicine that deals with the treatment of cancer.

15. Roundworms are the object of study here.

16. Determining whether a proposition is true is sometimes called this.

17. One can make use of this to help with the activity in item 16.

18. French for “bringing together.” Used by Bunge to explain a goal of scholarship because the world itself is one.

19. A mixed science divided sometimes into “human” and “physical.”

20. A very interdisciplinary field, touching on ethics, agriculture, forestry, biology, geography, urban planning, etc.

21. The branch of medicine dealing with the kidneys.

22. A puzzle concerning a curious piece of knowledge, often seemingly paradoxical.

23. A binary relation is said to be _____ when it is reflexive, symmetric, and transitive.

critical links, critical thinking

Post navigation

Previous Post: April 2023 Critical Links
Next Post: Marie-Claire Khadij is the Canadian Armed Forces’ first Humanist Chaplain

Comment (1) on “Keith’s Conundrums: A New Puzzle Hunt”

  1. Pingback: April 2023 Critical Links – Centre for Inquiry Canada

Comments are closed.

Donate via PayPal
Donate via Interac
Donate via CanadaHelps

Categories

a4a Announcement assistance for apostates Blasphemy Laws Blasphemy Laws CFI Community CFIC Volunteers Climate Change Cost of Religion critical links critical thinking Critical Thinking Week Debate Education Educational Material environment Event Give to CFIC governance health humanism Human Rights Information International Human Rights Living without Religion Media Advisory Medicine philosophy podcast Policy Press Release pseudoscience Quick Links quicklinks Science ScienceChek Science Literacy Secular Check Secularism Secularism in Schools Secular Rescue skeptics slider Think Check volunteer

View Full Calendar

CFI Canada is a CRA-Registered Educational Charity
Charitable Registration Number: 83364 2614 RR0001

Privacy Statement

Copyright © 2025 Centre for Inquiry Canada.

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme