Skip to content
Centre for Inquiry Canada (CFIC)

Centre for Inquiry Canada (CFIC)

Your humanist community for scientific, skeptical, secular, and rational inquiry.

  • About
    • What Is CFIC?
      • Mission, Vision, & Values
      • Centre for Inquiry Globally
      • Why We Need CFIC
      • History
    • Areas of Focus
      • Secularism
      • Scientific Skepticism
      • Critical Thinking
      • Building Community
    • Our Structure
      • Governance of CFIC
      • CFIC Bylaws
      • Branches
    • Supporters of CFIC
    • Contact
    • Privacy Statement
  • Media
    • Critical Links Newsletter
    • Podcast for Inquiry (PFI)
    • Other Videos
    • Cost of Religion Report
    • Search Archives
  • Get Involved
    • Join Us
    • Calendar of Events
    • Find a Local Branch
      • Victoria
      • Regina
      • Saskatoon
      • Winnipeg
      • Ottawa
      • Toronto
      • Montreal
      • Halifax
      • Virtual Branch
    • Volunteer
    • Mailing List
  • Donate
    • Donate to CFIC
    • CanadaHelps
    • PayPal
    • Interac Transfer
  • Become a Member
  • Toggle search form

The Case for Supporting Journalism … But What Journalism?

Posted on October 28, 2023December 3, 2023 By Critical Links 2 Comments on The Case for Supporting Journalism … But What Journalism?

Sandra Dunham

Most readers who are as old as I am will recall that a “paperboy” (some were girls, but we were less politically correct then) would drop off a newspaper every morning. We also might recall our parents tuning into the news at 6 and 10 pm. In my adult years, I have increasingly consumed news from the Internet and the radio.

During the pandemic, I subscribed (for free) to The New York Times‘ “The Morning.” I have enjoyed getting a synopsis of important events. At the same time, I’ve been frustrated when a paywall prevents me from accessing a full article. Slowly it dawned on me that I could (and should) pay a nominal amount to read the full article. It further occurs to me that if more people subscribe to newspapers, they might be able to hire more journalists and the quality of the information we read would be improved. 

I decided that I wanted a Canadian news source and that I would subscribe to The Toronto Star and its “First Up” newsletters. Before doing so, I checked the Star on Media Bias Fact Check. It is reported as being a centre-left news source. I then came to the realization that all of the news I consume is centre-left. This caused me to wonder, “Do my political tendencies influence what media I consume? Or does the media I consume influence my political tendencies?”

I have been unsuccessful in determining the direction of causation, but it appears indisputable that people do consume media that is consistent with their political views. Pew has done some research on ideology and news consumption in the U.S. In fact, about a quarter of Republicans and Democrats consistently consume only news outlets that align with them politically. Further, 20 percent of Republicans watch at least eight hours of Fox News (right wing) per month while 15 percent of Democrats watch the same amount on left leaning networks (e.g., MSNBC and CNN). It appears that this news consumption increases their political ideology. The same research suggests that consuming more variety of news would reduce political polarization and might act as a moderator of differing views.

Whether left- or right-leaning, the factors that best predict one’s ability to determine whether a headline was true or not include “greater levels of agreeableness, conscientiousness, open-mindedness, lower levels of extraversion and fewer hours of news consumption.”

Takeaways:

  1. Please consider paying for at least one news subscription that supports journalism.
  2. Check your own news consumption. If it’s too heavily weighted in one direction, consider consuming something from the other side.
  3. Consider whether consuming less news would be helpful.

As society becomes more polarized, it becomes increasingly important that we are more understanding of people whose ideology does not align with our own, that we are aware of our own biases, and that we participate in discussions to learn, rather than to convince.

critical thinking

Post navigation

Previous Post: Making History
Next Post: Two Healthy Decisions

Comments (2) on “The Case for Supporting Journalism … But What Journalism?”

  1. Alex Berljawsky says:
    November 2, 2023 at 8:13 am

    After 50 years of printed news delivered to my door, I now get news from TV and on-line from journalism sources and closed-group left-wing blogs. Filtering through critical thinking, I also check the occasional right-wing, conservative, or click-bait news source, just to see what the other side is up to.

  2. Patrick McDonald says:
    November 13, 2023 at 4:09 pm

    We still get two papers delivered.

Comments are closed.

Donate via PayPal
Donate via Interac
Donate via CanadaHelps

Categories

a4a Amateur Science Announcement assistance for apostates Blasphemy Laws Blasphemy Laws CFI Community CFIC Volunteers Climate Change Cost of Religion critical links critical thinking Critical Thinking Week Debate Education Educational Material environment Event Give to CFIC governance health humanism Human Rights Information International Human Rights Living without Religion Media Advisory Medicine philosophy podcast Policy Press Release pseudoscience Quick Links quicklinks Science ScienceChek Science Literacy Secular Check Secularism Secularism in Schools Secular Rescue slider Think Check volunteer

View Full Calendar

Contact

Center for Inquiry Canada (CFIC) Logo

info@centreforinquiry.ca
613-663-8198
PO Box 83045, Ottawa RPO Bank Walkley, Ontario, K1V 1A3

CFI Canada is a CRA-Registered Educational Charity. Charitable Registration Number: 83364 2614 RR0001

Read our Privacy Statement.

Quick Links

Our Mission
History of CFIC
Latest Announcements
Podcast for Inquiry (PFI)
Donate to CFIC
Become a Member

Follow Us

Subscribe Now

Copyright © 2026 Centre for Inquiry Canada (CFIC).

Powered by PressBook WordPress theme