On January 30, 2017 the federal government tabled a response to an electronic Parliamentary petition (E-382) calling for the repeal of Canada’s blasphemous libel law (Criminal Code Section 296).
Despite the generally accepted view that Canada’s blasphemy law is an outdated and dead law that would never be successful if used today, this is still an historic situation. The federal government has reviewed archaic legislation and repealed obsolete law before, but this is the first time that the blasphemy law has been clearly identified for attention (that we are aware of).
The government’s response to e-382 may be found on the Parliament of Canada website and states:
The government is committed to maintaining a fair, relevant, and accessible justice system for all Canadians.
In her mandate letter, the Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada has been asked to conduct a broad review of our criminal justice system. The Minister’s overarching goal is to ensure our legislation meets the highest standards of equity, fairness, and respect for the rule of law as well as the Constitution of Canada.
The crime of blasphemous libel, although included in the original Criminal Code of 1892, has not been the subject of a reported legal case since 1935. In 1979, a charge of blasphemous libel was laid in Ontario in a case involving the showing of Monty Python’s Life of Brian, but the charge was stayed.
Blasphemous libel, along with numerous other provisions of the Criminal Code, are presently under review by the Minister and her officials. The Minister looks forward to addressing these provisions in the course of her mandate.
This is an encouraging situation. Canadian secular humanists, and indeed any Canadian concerned to reduce faith-based tension and victimization in Canada and around the world must encourage our Parliamentarians to finally repeal this bill. Whether the repeal is part of an omnibus bill or a dedicated legislative action – the blasphemy law must go!
Blasphemy laws are an attempt to protect faith-based concepts and ideas from criticism. But this approach underlies much of the tension, victimization and violence throughout the world. When rational discussion of ideas is considered a criminal act, the results often include alienation, isolation, frustration and a desire to strike back.
We must also remember that Canada’s position on human rights issues around the world is greatly respected. When Canada opposes blasphemy laws here in Canada and around the world, an important message of inclusion, stability and good governance is sent.
It seems that the Canadian government, on this issue, is open to taking steps to advance an open Canadian society. CFIC members are encouraged to educate their local Members of Parliament about the importance of this step. Consider using the CFIC website for further information regarding this bad law. Simply type “blasphemy, Canada” into your search engine!
Did You Know?
CFIC began our strategies to oppose Canada’s blasphemous libel law in 2014! Change – even on an issue as self-evident as opposition to blasphemy laws is a long term commitment. Please support CFIC with a donation today. We are Canada’s leading secular humanist organization.
Comment on “Update on Parliamentary Petition e-382 calling for the elimnation of Canada’s anti-blasphemy law”
Comments are closed.
I certainly wholly support the CFIC efforts to have this discriminatory religious aggression erased from our so called law books. Can anyone think of a way it might be erased from our memories? I’m still searching for an organization which is willing to try to do that! Meanwhile, since this seems to be taking a while, how about the so called ‘Laws’ in regards to bigamy and suicide if your looking for some of the other real gems of organized religious crime. Well I know, hold on, one thing at a time, besides there are so many other pressing issues in our society today, as pure luck would have it of course, like how to stamp out Islamiphobia. When are the people who’ve never been down this road before finally going to be directed on to the road they always should have been on.