Parliamentary E-Petition Opposing Canada’s Blasphemy Law
CFI Canada is proud to join Humanist Canada, BC Humanist Association, Canadian Journalists for Free Expression and a growing list of other organizations in launching Petition e-382 in opposition to Criminal Code Section 296 – Canada’s blasphemous libel law.
E-petitions are a new feature of Canada’s federal political landscape – one which promises to increase the level of access to Parliament by Canadian citizens.
Petition to the Government of Canada
It has been eight decades since the last conviction under section 296, and thirty-five years since the last charge of blasphemous libel was laid.
Blasphemous libel serves no purpose in Canadian law or modern-day society, and would likely be found to contravene section 2 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which protects freedom of expression.
In Canada and elsewhere, blasphemy laws have been abused to suppress minorities and stifle inconvenient speech.
Authoritarian states point to Canada’s blasphemous libel law to defend their own laws criminalizing blasphemy.
Repealing Canada’s blasphemy law would demonstrate, at home and abroad, Canada’s commitment to the value of free speech for all.
Freedom of expression is the foundational human right in our society. Many others, including freedom of assembly and freedom of conscience, are derived from freedom of expression.
We, the undersigned, residents of Canada, call upon the Government of Canada to repeal section 296 (Blasphemous Libel) of the Canadian Criminal Code.
Now is the time for Canada’s Blasphemy Law to fall!
For more Information regarding Criminal Code Section 296 and its history, to download a sample educational letter for your local MP, and its connection to other blasphemy laws around the world, visit CFIC’s website.
CFI Canada’s Experts, Members and Friends Speak out!
Dr. Jeremy Patrick, Lecturer University of Southern Queensland
Paul Marshall, Senior Fellow at the Hudson Institute’s Center for Religious Freedom, Distinguished Senior Fellow the Institute for the Study of Religion at Baylor University, Senior Fellow at the Leimena Institute, Jakarta, and Visiting Professor at the Graduate School of Syarif Hidayatullah Islamic University (UIN) Jakarta, Indonesia. Author, Silenced: How Blasphemy and Apostasy Codes Choke freedom Worldwide.
I have examined blasphemy laws in over 50 countries and, regardless of the the intentions of their proponents, they universally become tools for repressing minorities and critics. They also choke debate about and within religions. No country that values robust criticism and discussion should have such laws.
Stephen Pinker, Johnstone Family Professor – Harvard University
Blasphemy laws are archaic, irrational, repressive, and an embarrassment to a modern democracy.
Dr. James Linville – Associate Professor – Department of Religious Studies, University of Lethbridge
As a professor of Religious Studies whose research and teaching subjects involve the critical examination of scriptures and beliefs held by many people today, Canada’s retention of a blasphemy law is very troubling. This is especially so given the increasing polarization of different political and religious groups in Canada and the horrific violence and discrimination of religious and secular minorities in many parts of the world.
There also seems to be a growing sensitivity to any perceived offence, and so “playing the devil’s advocate” in a class room carries a very real danger of being misunderstood. The law is a potential recourse for those offended by what is said in the context of Religious Studies or other academic disciplines and this only makes the teaching and the dissemination of this work more difficult than it already is. I feel it is only a matter of time before an academic or other student has to deal with threats of court action for something said in a class or written online or in print. Even though I consider it unlikely that myself or another professor may be found guilty or even charged under the law, any defense of the need for such a law is troubling.
Public discourse about religion hardly needs such a law. Most people already are respectful of others’ beliefs, and government agencies, political groups, corporations, and educational institutions generally follow their own policies of respect without reference to the law. The ending of the blasphemy law is not an attack on any religion or religion in general, but rather is recognition of the significance of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The right to say nothing controversial is hardly a right at all.
Jason Lawrence, CFI Canada’s Human Rights Chair & Member of Board of Directors
It is important that Canadian citizens and the government are aware thatwhen we criticize religious and faith-based violence in other countries where blasphemy is punishable by death and imprisonment, we undermine our cause by still having a blasphemy law of our own.
The blasphemous libel law is an affront to free speech and human rights. If Canada seeks to “move forward as a county”, then the Canadian government must recognize that blasphemy laws put marginalized groups, who have historically been the targets of religious persecution, at risk.*It is a conflict of interest for a secular society and for a country who both proclaims and recognizes the separation of church and state to still have a blasphemy law in the books.
Tom Henheffer, Executive Director – Canadian Journalists For Free Expression
Canada’s blasphemous libel law is an outrageous relic, a clear violation of charter rights, and a completely unjustifiable chill on free expression in our country. Every good journalist and free expression defender is opposed to this archaic law, and it must be scrapped. The fact that it is unlikely to be used is no excuse to have criminal libel on the books in a western democracy. Even worse, Canada’s blasphemous libel law gives a tragic comfort to despotic leaders around the world who use such regulations to jail free thinkers. It allows them to point to this Canadian statute as a shining justification for their choice forms of oppression.
Do you have something to say about Canada’s blasphemy law or blasphemy laws around the world? Please add your comments below!
Support Parliamentary Petition e-382 to repeal Criminal Code Section 296!
- CFI Canada Applauds the Norwegian Government
- ICABL Charter
- End Blasphemy Laws Now!
- CFIC Joins Call to Repeal Greek Blasphemy Law
- Looking Back, Looking Forward: A Year-End Perspective For 2015/2016
- Reason For Change
- A Brief History of Secularism in Canada
- Saskatchewan Wants a Secular Government
- CFIC Discusses Bangladesh with UNHCR and ORF
- 2016 Fundraising Campaign
- CFIC Implores the Canadian Government To Help Tareq Rahim
- Quebec’s Bill 59: A Hate Speech Bill
- York University
- United Way, Employee Giving and Centre For inquiry Canada
- Physician Assisted Dying: Use Science and Secular Values – Not Dogma
- Canada’s New Parliamentary E-Petition System
- CFIC Condemns Ongoing Faith-Based Murders in Bangladesh
- 17 Organizations Issue Joint Statement to PM Trudeau
- C-14 Passed
- City of Ottawa’s Hijab Day
- Montreal Pride
- Congratulations to CFI (US) on Leadership Transition
- Canada’s 42nd Election: Secularism and Science
- John Hofsess: Humanist Perspectives
- CFI Canada: Setting Our Agenda
- Kids For Inquiry Canada
- Joint Statement Condemning Bangladesh Government
- Ashu Solo vs City of Saskatoon and Randy Donauer
- O! Canada
- University of Toronto Scarborough
- Getting Involved!
- Saskatchewan Burlesque Controversy
- Centre For Inquiry Canada Podcast
- Bangladesh: Protection For Secular Human Rights and Atheist Bloggers
- Science Over Naturopathy in Sentencing of David and Collet Stephan
- CFIC Prince Edward Island
- Brad Wall’s Christmas Message: Should Saskatchewan Secularists Complain?
- Pseudo-Science: Inquiries into the Incursion of Pseudo-science into Health Services Education
- Planned Giving At Centre For Inquiry Canada
- CFIC Remembers Our Friends
- CFI On Pseudo-Science and Religion in Healthcare
- Celsius42 TCS (Tumour Cell Solution) Inquiry
- Thermal Imaging for Breast Cancer Not Approved in Canada
- CFIC Goes to Reason Rally 2016
- Muti: Traditional Medicine Practice in Africa
- Keeping Religion out of Schools in Alberta
- Critical Evaluation of Journalism: Deadly and Dangerous Pseudoscience
- Consumer Education and Advocacy
- Paris, November 2015
- Dangerous Dilutions
- Brussels March 2016
- Chilliwack: Rejects Dawkins’ The Magic of Reality
- CFI Halifax
- Gifts in Kind at Centre For Inquiry Canada
- Have You Ever Inquired About Services at a Naturopathic Clinic?
- Still Small Voices Book Launch
- Extraordinary Claims Website
- Recollections of the Founding of CFI Canada
- Living Without Religion – Overcoming Isolation